Webb Therapy Uncategorized AIPC (2021). Busting Common Myths About Anger. Issue 355 // Institute Inbrief. Retrieved June 17, 2021.

AIPC (2021). Busting Common Myths About Anger. Issue 355 // Institute Inbrief. Retrieved June 17, 2021.

All human beings experience anger at least occasionally. It’s a natural emotion helping us recognise that we or someone or something we care about has been violated or treated badly. When we feel threatened or our goals are thwarted, anger is a coping mechanism that enables us to act decisively, especially in situations where there is little time to reason things out. It can motivate problem-solving, goal-achievement, and the removing of threats. It serves a protective function and is not always a problem (Lowth, 2018; Stosny, 2020; Zega, 2009).

But anger is a complex emotion, and all too often manifests maladaptively in clients’ lives, when they perceive excessive need for protection, protect the “wrong” things, or use anger to thwart their longer-term best interests. The result is problem anger.

Perhaps because it is so multi-faceted, misperceptions about anger abound, and the question arises: how shall we regard anger? How do we advise the client to think about it? Folk wisdom often would say that the best thing to do is just let it all out, but is it? Clients complain that they cannot control it, that the tendency to be easily angered is inherited, but again, is there evidence for that? Here are common myths people tend to hold about anger, and factual statements following them that you can use to clarify for the client why learning to deal with problem anger is time well spent.

Myth 1: “Anger is inherited.”

This is the client that may try to claim that their father was short-tempered and they have inherited that trait from him, so there is nothing they can do. Such a stance implies an attitude that the expression of anger is a fixed, unalterable set of behaviours. Research shows, however, that expression of anger is learned, so if we have – say, through exposure to aggressive influential others, such as parents – learned to be violent in our expressions, we can also learn healthier, more appropriate, pro-social ways of dealing with it.

Myth 2: “Anger and aggression are the same thing.”

Fact: Nope. Anger is a felt emotional state. Aggression is a behaviour, sometimes carried out in response to anger, but not the same as it. A person can be angry, yet use healthy methods of expression without resorting to violence, threats, or other aggression. Anger does not always lead to aggression. In fact, some experts claim that most daily anger is not followed by aggression. When it does result in aggression the “I3 Model” (pronounced “I cubed”) is deemed responsible. This suggests that aggression emerges as a function of three interacting factors, which all begin with “I”:

Instigation, an event which instils an urge to aggress as a result of, say, being addressed rudely or learning that one’s partner has had an affair (or a relatively “minor” event, such as being cut off in traffic);

Impellance, meaning a force that increases the urge to act in response to an instigating stimulus. These could be strong hormonal releases or a belief system which says that the instigating event should not be tolerated, or even a sociocultural norm which demands that instigating stimuli be responded to immediately and harshly (such as punching back someone who has hit you);

Inhibition, referring to forces that typically work to counter aggression, such as cultural norms, awareness of negative consequences, or perspective-taking or empathy (Kassinove & Tafrate, 2019).

Myth 3: “Other people make me angry.”

Fact: How often in common parlance do we say things like, “He made me so angry!” or “You make me so mad I could kill you!”? Even though we may occasionally speak about people causing emotions other than anger, it is far more frequent to hear such statements in regard to anger. We can choose whether or not we let someone else’s behaviour make us happy, sad, or something else, but we often think and talk about it as if anger is caused directly by others. With the undiscerning listener, an angry person thus gets to use anger as an excuse for unacceptable behaviour. Ultimately, it is not the other person’s behaviour that causes our anger, and in fact, it’s not even their intention, though that may influence our behaviour. Being precise, we must acknowledge that it is our interpretation of their intention, expressed in their behaviour/language, which is causative.

Myth 4: “I shouldn’t hold anger in; it’s better to let it out” (either by venting or catharsis).

Fact: If by “holding it in” someone means that they suppress anger, it’s true; ignoring it won’t make it go away and squashing it down is not a healthy choice. Neither, however, is venting. Blowing up in an aggressive tirade only fuels the fire, reinforcing the problem anger. Ditto the use of pillow-punching or other means of catharsis; this may come as a surprise to therapists trained a few years ago, when catharsis was an anger management technique in good standing. Now researchers have found that, even though we feel better in the moment after hitting something, our brain notices, subtly changing its wiring. Then the next time we are angry it softly whispers, “Hit something; you’ll feel better”. The time after that, the wiring is stronger in the brain towards a hitting catharsis, and the angry-brain-voice speaks a little louder. Continuing in this vein means that eventually, we could decide to hit something more alive than a pillow. Rather than either angry venting or catharsis is the use of skills to manage the angry impulse.

Myth 5: “Anger, aggression, and intimidation help me to earn respect and get what I want.”

Fact: People may be afraid of a bully, but they don’t respect those who cannot control themselves or deal with opposing viewpoints. Communicating respectfully is a far superior way to get (most) people to listen and accommodate one’s needs. While the momentary power that comes with successful intimidation may feel heady in the moment, it does not help build the healthy relationships that most people coming to counselling yearn to have.

Myth 6: Anger affects only a certain category of people.

Fact: Anger is a universal emotion that affects everyone. It does not discriminate against people of any particular age, nationality, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education, or religion. It is tempting for some people in the educated middle classes to believe that anger is more prevalent among the poor, or those who are less educated or lacking in social skills. Reality does not bear this out, although the expressions of anger do vary among different social groups. Remember, anger is just an emotion, one which does not make people “good” or “bad” for having it.

Myth 7: “I can’t help myself. Anger isn’t something you can control.”

We don’t always get to control the situations of our lives, and some of them may trigger our anger. In fact, it’s also agreed by experts that we don’t (in the short-term) control whether we have angry feelings or not; they just come – although there are longer-term ways to work with clients that see them less easily provoked, and therefore less prone to have the experience of anger. What we do have the short-term choice to control is how we express that anger. Continuing in sessions with you (the therapist) for the purpose of learning how to better handle anger means having more choices of response, even in highly provocative situations.

Myth 8: “When I’m angry I will say what I really mean.”

Fact: This is rarely true. Uncontrolled angry expressions are more about gaining control of or hurting others, not saying what a person’s deepest truth is. 

Myth 9: “By not saying what I’m thinking in the moment, I’m being dishonest and will be even angrier later.”

Fact: There is a strong pull to “speak our mind” when angry. But it is at this time that a person’s judgment is most severely flawed. To speak from anger is to allow the impulsive part of the brain to overrule the rational part. Better for relationships, career, and pretty much everything else to wait until that reasoning part can regain control.

Myth 10: “Men are angrier than women.”

Fact: The sexes experience the same amount of anger, says research; they just express it differently. Men often use aggressive tactics and expressions, whereas women (often constrained culturally) more frequently choose indirect means of expression, such as found in passive-aggressive tactics. This could mean getting back at someone by talking negatively about them or cutting them out of their lives (categories adapted from: Therapist Aid LLC, 2016; Segal & Smith, 2018; Morin, 2015; Morrow, n.d.; Better Relationships, 2021; Gallagher, 2001).

Thought for reflection

Anger has many facets to it, and we have introduced some information here that may seem either startling or counterintuitive. As you think back over the myths we just debunked, which aspect has surprised you the most? Do you have any sense of why that might be? One woman, for example, was very surprised to hear that “men are angrier than women” was only considered a myth; it turned out that in her family, women “never got angry” (we hypothesise that perhaps they were socialised to not show anger), and the men got angry all the time (perhaps more allowed in that woman’s family/culture). In what ways, if at all, might your views about anger have shaped how you behave? How you respond to others? 

And here’s the ultimate question if you share this material with a client: what are their responses to the above questions? How might hearing these myths help them seek more adaptive ways to deal with problem anger? 

The upcoming Mental Health Academy course, “Helping Clients Deal with Problem Anger” draws from numerous therapies and neuroscience to help clinicians and clients collaboratively create a program to address each client’s unique challenges with this universal human emotion.

References:

  1. Better Relationships. (2021). Common myths about anger. Anglicare Southern Queensland. Retrieved on 13 April, 2021, from: Website.
  2. Gallagher, E. (2001). Anger. eddiegallagher.com.au. Retrieved on 13 April, 2021, from: Website.
  3. Kassinove, H., & Tafrate, R.C. (2019). The practitioner’s guide to anger management: Customizable interventions, treatments, and tools for clients with problem anger. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. 
  4. Lowth, M. (2018). Anger management. Patient. Retrieved on 7 April, 2021, from: Website.
  5. Morin, A. (2015). 7 myths about anger and why they’re wrong. Psychology Today. Retrieved on 13 April, 2021, from: Website.
  6. Morrow, A. (n.d.). Anger myths. Stress and Anger Management Institute. Retrieved on 13 April, 2021, from: Website.
  7. Segal, J., & Smith, M. (2018). Anger management: Tips and techniques for getting anger under control. Helpguide.org. Retrieved on 9 April, 2021, from: Website.    
  8. Stosny, S. (2020). Beyond anger management. Psychology Today. Retrieved on 9 April, 2021, from: Website.
  9. Therapist Aid, LLC. (2016). Anger warning signs. Therapist Aid LLC. Retrieved on 7 April, 2021, from: Website.
  10. Zega, K. (2009). Holistic Psychotherapy (159). Retrieved on 7 April, 2021, from: Website.

Related Post

Treatment-resistant Substance Use DisorderTreatment-resistant Substance Use Disorder

There continues to be an ongoing gap between how addiction gets treated and how it actually works.

Knowledge and behaviour are handled by different systems. Insight lives largely in the prefrontal cortex — the part of the brain that plans, weighs consequences, and holds “I know this is bad for me.” But addiction increasingly reshapes subcortical circuits involved in craving, habit, and stress reactivity. Under cue exposure or stress, those older circuits can override the newer, knowledge-holding ones. This is why someone can recite their relapse triggers perfectly in a therapist’s office or recount pages of 12-step literature from memory and still act against that knowledge the moment they’re actually standing in the triggering situation.

Wiers and colleagues’ work on “dual process” models of addiction — explicit cognition versus automatic, implicit approach biases — captures this well. Cognitive bias modification research grew directly out of the finding that explicit knowledge doesn’t touch these automatic processes.

The transition from goal-directed use to habit. Everitt and Robbins’ work describes how repeated substance use shifts control from goal-directed brain circuits (which respond to consequences and knowledge) to habitual, and eventually compulsive, circuits centred in the dorsal striatum. Compulsive behaviour is, by definition, less responsive to knowing better. Decades of use can entrench this shift very deeply.

For example:

Early: goal-directed. Bad day → “I want to relax” → decide to drink. The action is chosen and tied to an expected outcome. If consequences got bad enough, the person could still stop — this runs through prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum.

Middle: habit. After years of stress → drink → relief, the sequence no longer needs a decision. Walking in the door at 6pm triggers pouring a drink before any conscious “do I want this?” moment happens. The cue now drives the action directly. Control has shifted to dorsolateral striatum — same circuitry as driving a familiar route on autopilot.

Late: Compulsive. In Everitt and Robbins’ animal studies, drug-seeking gets paired with a mild shock. Most animals stop once punished. But a subset — roughly a third, matching the rate of severe addiction in humans — keeps seeking the drug even though it now reliably delivers a shock. That’s the model for compulsion: behaviour persisting despite known, immediate harm.

The human version: Someone with DUI’s, lost relationships, health scares — every piece of proof the behaviour is destructive — still relapses. Not from lack of knowledge; they’ve lived the consequences repeatedly. The circuitry driving the behaviour at this stage doesn’t consult the consequence-tracking system the way it did early on.

This is also why pure education or insight-oriented therapy often under-performs at this stage — it’s arguing with a system that isn’t listening. Interventions that interrupt the cue-response link itself (contingency management, environmental restructuring, craving-blunting medication, removing triggers) tend to have more traction, because they target the habit/compulsion circuit rather than trying to out-inform it.

Koob and Volkow’s allostasis model. Their research reframes chronic addiction as a shift from positive reinforcement (seeking a high) to negative reinforcement (avoiding a increasingly severe dysphoric, anxious, irritable state without the substance). Long-term users aren’t chasing a reward anymore — they’re fleeing a state. That flight response is fast, automatic, and largely indifferent to intellectual understanding.

Unresolved comorbidity. A large fraction of people with treatment-resistant, decades-long relapse patterns have under-treated trauma, complex PTSD, personality disorders, or conditions like ADHD sitting underneath the substance use. If the underlying driver isn’t directly addressed, coping skills training treats the symptom while the engine keeps running. This is a common finding in dual-diagnosis literature — outcomes are much worse when co-occurring conditions go unaddressed even amid extensive substance-focused treatment.

Recovery capital, not just recovery knowledge. William White’s work on recovery capital argues sustained recovery depends on social, financial, physical, and community resources — stable housing, relationships, purpose, employment — not just internal coping skills. Someone can have excellent DBT (Dialectical Behaviour Therapy) skills and still relapse repeatedly if their environment, relationships, or life structure haven’t meaningfully changed.

Relapse as expected, not exceptional. Prochaska and DiClemente’s stages-of-change model treats relapse as a normal part of the cycle, not a failure of knowledge. But when relapse repeats over decades despite intensive treatment, researchers increasingly look at severity markers — poly-substance use, genetic loading, age of onset, impulsivity and risk-taking — that predict a harder course regardless of how much psychoeducation someone has absorbed.

The consistent variable across all of this: Insight is necessary but nowhere near sufficient. Addiction at that level of chronicity behaves more like a deeply conditioned neurobiological and habitual process than an information deficit. That’s also part of why chronic relapse is increasingly framed like a chronic illness — closer to diabetes or hypertension in its relapsing-remitting course — rather than something insight alone should be expected to resolve.

Here’s what the literature and clinical guidelines point to for people who’ve cycled through standard treatment repeatedly without sustained success. I’ll organise by approach type.

Pharmacological — often underused

  • For opioid use disorder, methadone and buprenorphine substantially outperform abstinence-only approaches in treatment-resistant populations — this is some of the strongest evidence in the entire addiction field, yet many long-term relapsers have never actually been offered maintenance medication, often due to program philosophy (abstinence-only 12-step programs) rather than clinical reasoning.
  • For alcohol, naltrexone (blocks the reward), acamprosate (reduces post-acute withdrawal dysregulation), and disulfiram (aversive) are under-prescribed. Naltrexone specifically blunts the reward signal that drives compulsive use — targeting the biology rather than relying on willpower.
  • Emerging: psychedelic-assisted therapy (psilocybin, ketamine) is showing promise in trials for alcohol and other use disorders, though this is newer evidence and not yet standard of care everywhere.

Interrupting the cue-response cycle directly

  • Contingency management — tangible rewards for verified abstinence — has some of the best effect sizes in the literature, particularly for stimulant use disorders where no strong pharmacological option exists. It works by directly competing with the habit circuit rather than arguing with it.
  • Environmental restructuring — changing routes, routines, social circles, physically removing cues — matters more than intellectual insight at this stage, because the behaviour has become cue-triggered rather than decision-driven.

Treating what’s underneath

  • Systematic assessment for under-treated trauma, complex PTSD, ADHD, and personality disorders. Trauma-focused therapies (EMDR, prolonged exposure, Seeking Safety) address the driver rather than just the symptom, and are often skipped in standard programs focused on the substance alone.
  • Integrated dual-diagnosis treatment (treating psychiatric conditions and addiction concurrently, by the same team) outperforms sequential or parallel treatment where the person bounces between separate providers.

Building recovery capital, not just coping skills

  • Housing First and supported employment models — stabilising the environment before or alongside treatment — show better outcomes than clinical treatment alone in chronic, treatment-resistant cases. William White’s recovery capital framework: outcomes track with social support, stable housing, purpose, and community as much as with therapy itself.
  • Recovery community centres and mutual-aid alternatives beyond 12-step (SMART Recovery, Refuge Recovery) matter for people whose repeated 12-step involvement hasn’t translated to sustained sobriety — fit between the person and the model isn’t universal.

Reframing the model of care itself

  • Treating addiction like a chronic relapsing-remitting illness (the diabetes/hypertension model) rather than an acute, curable event changes what “treatment resistant” even means. Long-term, low-intensity, indefinite maintenance care (medication, periodic check-ins, ongoing peer support) shows better outcomes than repeated cycles of intensive short-term treatment followed by discharge.
  • Harm reduction as a bridge or destination — not necessarily full abstinence — for people who haven’t achieved abstinence-based sobriety after years of trying. This reduces mortality and morbidity even when abstinence isn’t currently achievable, and can sometimes become a pathway toward it later.
  • Multidimensional Family Therapy / systemic approaches — treating the family/relational system rather than the individual alone — show better outcomes for people whose relapse is tangled up in unchanged relational dynamics.

Stress ManagementStress Management

NOTE: All these skills will require practice

1. Cognitive (thinking) techniques

  • Identify your stressors or potential stressors. Sometimes, “stress” is frustration or fear in disguise.
  • Plan ahead
  • Decision making and problem solving
  • Accept what we cannot change

Changing how we see stressful situations

We may not be able to change our circumstances, but we can see them differently (Forsyth & Eifert, 2016). For example, stress can be viewed as an experience that will support our learning, growth, and personal development.

Technique: Accept – Choose – Take action

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has proven valuable for people learning to manage anxiety and stress; it encourages:

  • Letting go of the struggles that keep them stuck
  • Cultivating peace of mind
  • Accepting what is, and doing what works

Rather than struggle to reduce stress and anxiety, we:

a. accept what we are already experiencing and then 

b. choose the direction we would like our life to take, and then

c. take action that reflects are values

Technique: Radical acceptance

Radical acceptance is often practiced within Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT).  Radical acceptance is based on the notion that suffering does not come directly from painful experiences but our attachment to them. For example, workplace stress may be more about your identity and status in the workplace rather than the stress itself.

Radical acceptance means fully accepting everything that you are experiencing in the present moment i.e., thoughts, feelings, emotions, body sensations, reactions, attitude, environment etc. We fully accept the present moment because what we resist persists. The more we deny reality the more painful (or unpleasant) we will perceive it to be. Radical acceptance is about saying “yes” to exactly what is happening for us in the moment.

  • Radical acceptance is about accepting life on life’s terms and not resisting what one cannot or chooses not to change.
  • Accepting doesn’t mean agreeing. It’s simply exhausting to fight reality, and it doesn’t work.
  • Resisting reality delays healing and adds suffering to one’s pain.

Technique: Challenging core beliefs

Our core beliefs can shape how we face up to the difficult times and how we react to stress (Beck, 2011) and reconstructing them in a balanced way that allows room for perceived shortcomings.

Humans subconsciously “look for” evidence to support their core beliefs about themselves and the world.

You may have to take mental control to actively on-purpose look for evidence to the contrary.

Technique: Acceptance of our thoughts and feelings

The goal of ACT is to accept what lies beyond our control and commit to life-enhancing actions instead.

There are six core processes in ACT:

1. Contact with the Present Moment

Conscious awareness of your experience in the present moment enables you to perceive accurately what is happening Gives you important information about whether to change or persist in behaviour Enables you to ‘catch’ cognitive fusion ‘in flight’ Allows you to engage fully in what you are doing.

2. Acceptance

Actively contacting psychological experiences directly, fully, and without needless defense Definition: defused, open, undefended contact with the present moment, as a fully conscious human being.

‘Opening yourself fully to experience, as it is, not as your mind says it is’.

3. Defusion

Looking at thoughts, rather than from thoughts Noticing thoughts, rather than being caught up in thoughts Seeing thoughts as what they are, not as what they seem to be Aim of Defusion is NOT to feel better, nor to get rid of unwanted thoughts Aim of Defusion IS to reduce influence of unhelpful cognitive processes upon behaviour; to facilitate being psychologically present & engaged in experience; to facilitate awareness of language processes, in order to enhance psychological flexibility.

4. Self-as-context or The Observing Self:

Observe and accept all changing experiences.

How rigid is your thinking? Allow for psychological flexibility. Think in new ways. Consider other perspectives. Ask people for their perspective.

It is a process, not a thing: an awareness of awareness itself: ‘pure awareness’.

It is that aspect of a human being that does all the noticing/observing of one’s inner and outer world. You could call this “meta-awareness” or “pure awareness” if you prefer: it’s the awareness of one’s awareness, or the noticing of one’s noticing, or the consciousness of one’s consciousness.

5. Values

 Chosen life directions ‘Your heart’s deepest desires for the sort of person you want to be and the things you want to do in your time on this planet; in other words, what you want to stand for in life’ Provide motivation & inspiration Provide guidance for your actions Give life meaning Give a sense of abundance Are different to goals 6.Committed Action Overt behaviour in the service of values (may require skills training) Committed action is: values-guided, effective & mindful

Technique: Meditation for acceptance

Meditation is a powerful tool for accepting stressful situations and difficult emotions. Bring your attention, non-judgementally, to your mind, body, and environment. Here are some alternative definitions:

 “Bringing one’s complete attention to the present experience on a moment-to-moment basis.” (Marlatt & Kristeller)

“Paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally” (Kabat-Zinn).

“The nonjudgmental observation of the ongoing stream of internal and external stimuli as they arise.” (Baer)

“Awareness of present experience with acceptance.” (Germer, Segal, Fulton)

“Consciously bringing awareness to your here-and-now experience, with openness, interest, and receptiveness.”

Allow everything to be just as it is. Do the following to start for 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, or as long as you like, whenever you like:

1. Take a seat. Find place to sit that feels calm and quiet to you.

2. Set a time limit.

3. Notice your body.

4. Feel your breath.

5. Notice when your mind has wandered.

6. Be kind to your wandering mind.

7. Close with kindness.

Technique: Grounding and centering

  • 5-4-3-2-1 Technique

Using the 5-4-3-2-1 technique, you will purposefully take in the details of your surroundings using each of your senses. Strive to notice small details that your mind would usually tune out, such as distant sounds, or the texture of an ordinary object.

VisionWhat are 5 things you can see? Look for small details such as a pattern on the ceiling, the way light reflects off a surface, or an object you never noticed.
TouchWhat are 4 things you can feel? Notice the sensation of clothing on your body, the sun on your skin, or the feeling of the chair you are sitting in. Pick up an object and examine its weight, texture, and other physical qualities.
SoundWhat are 3 things you can hear? Pay special attention to the sounds your mind has tuned out, such as a ticking clock, distant traffic, or trees blowing in the wind.
SmellWhat are 2 things you can smell? Try to notice smells in the air around you, like an air freshener or freshly mowed grass. You may also look around for something that has a scent, such as a flower or an unlit candle.
TasteWhat is 1 thing you can taste? Carry gum, candy, or small snacks for this step. Pop one in your mouth and focus your attention closely on the flavours.
  • Naming categories

Choose a category (e.g., colours, shapes, textures), then look around the room and name all of the things you can see in that category.

Cold water

Have a few slow sips of cold water, feeling the sensation of the cold water in your mouth and notice the sensation as you swallow.

Washing your face with cold water can also reduce your heart rate and lower stress levels.

  • Counting

Count backwards from 20. You can do this as many times as you need to. Say to yourself that you are becoming calming as you count down each number.

  • Notice your breath

Take a deep breath and as you exhale, imagine breathing out strongly through the soles of your feet. Feel the connection of your feet with the floor. Do this three times.

2. Behaviours that can protect our vulnerability to stressful situations

It is essential to consider what skills and tips we can use to manage stress and ultimately improve our wellbeing inside and outside work:

  • Exercise i.e., running, swimming, resistance training, aerobics etc.
  • Eating healthy foods
  • Avoiding alcohol and other drugs
  • Recommended sleep at the recommended times i.e., 8 hours during the night hours.
  • See your GP if you are experiencing physical or psychiatric illness
  • Spend time with family and friends
  • Engage in a hobby or create a hobby
  • Meditation, yoga, group exercise, group mindfulness classes
  • Listening to music
  • Setting a time to watch tv and having boundaries re length of time watching tv
  • Read a book

Self-care tips

Life, and particularly work, can be stressful. Self-care is essential to keep us functioning well and improving our overall wellbeing (Bush, 2015).

The following aspects of our health are vital to our wellbeing and crucial for managing stress better. Ask yourself the following questions when your intuition tells you that you may be in a deficit:

  1. Without sleep, we cannot think clearly – are you getting sufficient sleep?
  2. Exercise is one of the best cures for stress – are you prioritizing physical activity?
  3. Our brain is maintained by the food we eat – are you eating a balanced and varied diet?
  4. Healthy relationships are vital for our wellbeing – are you making time for the people you care about?
  5. Self-expression enriches who we are and how we live – are you giving the focus you would like to the things you are passionate about?
  6. Community and spirituality ground who we are and how we live – how can you make yourself more open to both?

Managing stress in the workplace

Stress is a significant factor in many workplaces, resulting in countless hours lost due to time off or non-productive hours. We may think the responsibility is on workplaces to create environments that reduce stress and help workplace stress, but it’s also very much an individual responsibility.

Putting in place each of the following will help (modified from HBR guide to beating burnout, 2021):

  1. Increase psychological safety
    Trust and collaboration will reduce the perception that the workplace is a threat.
  2. Build regular break times
    We cannot focus for beyond 120 minutes without appropriate rest breaks. Build them into the day and encourage people to use them.
  3. Encourage the use of private workspaces
    Open offices often have many distractions that can frustrate staff when unable to concentrate. Supply private workplaces where staff can focus without interruption.
  4. Set boundaries around time outside of work
    The borders between work and personal life are often blurred, especially if working remotely. Set clear expectations and stick to them.
  5. Create flexible work policies
    Juggling work and family life is not easy. Flexibility can remove or reduce that stress without feelings of guilt.
  6. Make sure people are in the right roles
    When staff are doing jobs they enjoy and are well supported they thrive and take challenges in their stride.
  7. Encourage autonomy
    Micromanaging is stressful for everyone. Give teams the autonomy to manage their own projects and staff their individual tasks.

3. Further Stress Relief Activities

Positive emotions such as joy, awe, hope, and optimism are essential to living the good life and are known stress relief techniques. They strengthen our psychological resources for overcoming tough, stressful times (Seligman, 2011).

Boosting positive emotions

  • Practice gratitude. A helpful way to practice gratitude is to think of everything you have in life and imagine if something was taken away.
  • Spent time with people who you love.
  • Do something kind for someone else.
  • Spend time in nature.
  • Take a break from screens (tv, mobiles, computers).
  • Take a break from listening to the news.
  • Take a work holiday.
  • Laugh more – find something to laugh about and share it with someone. How often are you laughing?

Build hope

Hope is a positive, optimistic frame of mind in which we expect good events and scenarios to occur. The ability to remain hopeful can help you bounce back more effectively from life’s difficulties when they crop up (Seligman, 2011).

Improving self-awareness

Mindful reflection can leave us grounded and better aware of ourselves and our situation. The Who am I without this stress? exercise helps us focus on what is “right” with us rather than what is “wrong”.

Once centred by our breathing, ask yourself to consider:

What do I value most in life?
Are my current stressors more important than what’s most important?
What do I enjoy doing?
What do I look forward to every day?
When do I feel at my best?

Change the way you talk to yourself

When we are stressed, we sometimes say negative or self-defeating things to ourselves. Unhelpful self-talk might include things like, “I can’t cope”, “I’m too busy to deal with all this”, “This is all their fault”, or “I’ll never get this done”. Negative self-talk can make it more difficult to manage stress.

Notice your self-talk and work on using helpful, soothing, and calming self-talk, such as, “I am coping well given what I have on my plate”, “Relax, this stressful time will pass”, or “This is a stressful situation, but what is one thing I can do to help me get through this?”

Ask yourself:

  • Am I overestimating the likelihood of a negative outcome?
  • Am I overestimating how bad the consequences will be?
  • Am I underestimating my ability to cope?